When we defined above, it wasn’t necessarily Transitive
(so we needed the last step)
Let be the statement ” is the smallest uncountable Ordinal”
Then
To see this note:
Being an Ordinal is Absolute, so is an ordinal in
Countability is so Upwards Absolute so
If , its countability is witnessed by surjective.
But then so
In particular, we have .
Let the set of all subformulas of .
Now by construction, but is the only witness to
so .
But as is countable,
so is not Transitive.
Corollary
“Being countable” and “being cardinal”
are not Absolute statements between and .
In particular, countable is and cardinal is .
Proof
Suppose from above is in
where means ” is the smallest uncountable ordinal”
Then:
necessarily has to be as is Transitive
Then is a countable Ordinal.
Note that is defined as the witness for .
So whatever thinks that is,
it is definitely not the same as what thinks.
So Cardinals are not preserved.
And moreover "" is countable in , but not countable in .